Jonathan Aquilina wrote
> Cant they just be tagged as outdated or something of the sort? That way we
> dont need to delete them. that is how the ubuntu community help wiki does
> it.

Build a static pdf and keep that as history-reference? I believe tools
exists for that op??
But its more like -who will do, and who know how to safely move/remove
current wiki -right?
Imo a lot in the current pages are still valid, and 'just' need 'some'
ajustments. + new imagery! -i have already thrown my 10 cent there, buuut a
good thing should be repeated :p  :Central ImageDB!





--
View this message in context: 
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Wiki-revival-tp8762p8914.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to