Jonathan Aquilina wrote > Cant they just be tagged as outdated or something of the sort? That way we > dont need to delete them. that is how the ubuntu community help wiki does > it.
Build a static pdf and keep that as history-reference? I believe tools exists for that op?? But its more like -who will do, and who know how to safely move/remove current wiki -right? Imo a lot in the current pages are still valid, and 'just' need 'some' ajustments. + new imagery! -i have already thrown my 10 cent there, buuut a good thing should be repeated :p :Central ImageDB! -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Wiki-revival-tp8762p8914.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel