Thank you kindly.  I will certainly have questions once I try it out.  For
now, it has been published to the project page here:
https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/wiki/Packaging-Ubuntu-PPA

I invite anyone that has time to try it to edit it and put it into proper
markdown format.  For now, it's been slightly modified and placed into a
large codeblock until someone has time to comb through it.

- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Israel <israeld...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Here Ya go Tres!
> If you have questions, let me know
>
>
> On 08/25/2014 12:09 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>
> @Israel,
>
> Can you please offer this cheat sheet?  What you are describing is a bit
> foreign to me, perhaps that would shed some light on it. :)
>
>  - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Israel <israeld...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>   On 08/24/2014 10:50 PM, Vesa wrote:
>>
>>  On 08/25/2014 06:40 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>>
>> Thanks.  Hmmm... intersting... Ok, so you're really just following our
>> build tutorial to and then running checkinstall.
>>
>>  This is from the Ubuntu wiki:
>>
>>  CheckInstall is not designed to produce packages suitable for
>>> distribution. Do not use it to produce packages intended for the Ubuntu
>>> archive or PPAs. Instead, follow the Packaging Guide.
>>
>>
>>  So it seems like it's probably not a good way to do permanent
>> packaging.
>>
>>
>> Yeah no it isn't. I use checkinstall when I compile stuff from source
>> because it's a neat way to keep track of self-compiled programs, but I
>> don't think it works for creating generic packages.
>>
>> Also a thing to note is that you'll probably also need to pass compiler
>> flags to GCC to generate generic code, otherwise your package will only
>> work for people with similar enough CPU's to yours.
>>
>>
>>  
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Slashdot TV.
>> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.http://tv.slashdot.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LMMS-devel mailing 
>> listLMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>>
>>  Hi... making a PPA is a better way to do this.
>> There are a lot of ways to do this in a better fashion.  I already have a
>> bzr branch for Utopic with 1.0.3  If you want I could set it to build for
>> Trusty and Precise.
>> A PPA will work for 32bit and 64bit, however if you want to build for PPC
>> or ARM, you will need to build it on one of those devices.  If you have all
>> the needed Ubuntu build tools you can grab the source of the PPA and build
>> the deb from that, and build in pbuilder for the specific release you are
>> on, etc..
>> A PPA is also better, as the control file automatically pulls in all the
>> current depends.
>>
>> If you want I can give you a pbuilder/bzr cheat sheet I have made.
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Slashdot TV.
>> Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
>> http://tv.slashdot.org/
>> _______________________________________________
>> LMMS-devel mailing list
>> LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to