diiz wrote > can't reproduce, tested on that same branch. LFO seems > to behave just fine over here...
And that on win x32? - I wonder if tres reproduced? He does not say anything. I have tryed the same file again, and it does the same thing (you did use the one i posted?) I will try to reproduce in a /new/ file, and see if the weirdness persists On a side ..note :) - do you know a secure easy /file-up-load site/, with no add-traps. Tres has bad feelings for pastebin, whitch i used to use, and on the dl side it /is/ dirty :/ Perhaps its the actual file - i just pasted the xml (but if is the file, it would show up in a re-build, so thats what i will do now -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LFO-speed-inconsistency-tp10266p10280.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
