On 09/06/2014 06:57 PM, musikbear wrote: > diiz wrote >> If anyone disagrees, >> speak up now... > one question - will 1.1 be with memory-manager (mm)?
No, that's in the 1.2 branch > (I wrote you a personal message regarding /mm/, and test-results yesterday) If you follow the mailing list, you can see that the performance hit in the memmgr branch has already been noted, and also that the MemoryManager is not the culprit for this performance regression. We're already trying to track down the cause for this regression. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
