So, release 1.1.0 now (maybe wait for the MAC version to finish?) without the changes to Monstro, or did you plan on implementing these enhancements before the release?
diiz wrote > Speaking of Monstro, I wonder if I should add some extra modulation > option for Osc2 in Monstro, purely for the reason that there is extra > space in the matrix tab... Maybe panning modulation - would anyone find > this useful? > > Also, maybe an option to disable each LFO/Envelope if the user knows > they aren't going to use them in the project at all - this could be a > way to conserve CPU as Monstro can be pretty heavy on the resources... -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Let-s-release-1-1-tp10316p10373.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
