Hmm... well I don't think allowing fill-ins is necessarily forcing tighter
restrictions on the content, although for simplicity's sake, having only a
handful of open licenses could certainly benefit the person looking for
training, inspiration or remixing candidates by simplifying the landscape
for them. :/
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Rob <sourceforge-raind...@kudla.org>
wrote:
> On 10/21/2014 11:38 AM, Vesa wrote:
> > Who are we to dictate what licenses users should use?
>
> "We" would be the people paying for hosting. I certainly would not host any
> non-freely-licensed projects if I were "we". You want to put restrictions
> on your work, pay for your own damn hosting and promotion. Seems like a
> reasonable rule to me.
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
> Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
> Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
> Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho
> _______________________________________________
> LMMS-devel mailing list
> LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
