Thanks for the email. I'm never a fan of breaking backwards compatibility but if we do I would like to take the "old résumé" approach:
- We can lose formatting, but we ALWAYS keep the content (in this case our midi notes) - We try out best to maintain the same basic layout (keep our tracks/channels *somewhat* resembling what they were before) - We never let the software crash because an old file is opened - If the changes are extremely drastic, we consider using new file extensions to put a line in the sand I would also like to see 2.0 start working toward some of widget layout/screen-real-estate ideas but I also admit that they are mostly cosmetic and probably better suited for someone like myself. :) The rest I think is great. I still have some strong personal feelings about prioritization of some of these features versus some others I feel the community has been begging for, but I'd rather not take your email off topic and bring up bug popularity, since this isn't a democracy (and really can't be, at least not yet). -Tres
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
