Tres Finocchiaro wrote >> The sample repo is not inactive > > It has had 0 commits in 2 months... perhaps our definitions of "active" > differ... > > And this is different from my proposal how exactly?
LMMS has been inactive at least six months without being deleted. I don't see why you would just go ahead and delete stuff? I want to finish what I started, but I can't see long time into the future right now, in one month I will know if I can and will bother continue working on it. I just thought it would be easier than creating a new one? That's all I meant with keeping it, at least for one more month, please. You should hear from Lucas before deleting the other :) -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Repo-clean-up-tp11358p11362.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
