On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Vesa <[email protected]> wrote:
> A reminder: before we add any online features to LMMS, we need to
> remember that any time something is connected online, it brings with it
> a whole bunch of new issues to worry about.
>
> As long as LMMS is a purely local application, we don't need to worry
> about such things. The moment we allow LMMS to connect online, we accept
> a responsibility of handling the user's data over networks, and all the
> privacy & security concerns that come with it. Simply adding an online
> feature while ignoring those concerns is unacceptable.
>
> So we really need a cost/benefit analysis here...
@Vesa,
These original comments of yours seem to have gotten lost in the abyss of
our mailing list when the discussion last surfaced. I've appended them to
the #661 <https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/661> bug report.
-Tres
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
