The first attack was here:
Comparing AppImages with run files makes it clear you have no idea what
> you're talking about and didn't even bother reading the thread and the
> thoughtful, thorough comments other people wrote here.
The ad hominem continues here (making false claims that an individual is
invested against a technology)
If your best argument is "makeself does everything that AppImage does" then
> why are you so invested against AppImage?
The ad hominem is implicitly continued with this comment.
> There seem to be several people here in favor of offering an AppImage and
> one in favor of a run file.
The topic shifts, but the targeted comments continue:
> Explain to me why, when @probonopd already has a working AppImage,
> verified by yourself, using a very simple YAML recipe? You were advocating
> for keeping this discussion strictly towards the benefits of each packaging
> method. What technical advantages does building an AppImage from scractch
> have over a deb-based one?
And then here:
> If you (or anyone) cannot provide an argument for .run files over
> AppImages it seems to me this discussion is then settled.
Claiming victory of a sided argument that was asked on several occasions to
avoid is what finally got it locked.
If at any point I baited this conversation, I apologize for that and that
alone.
If you feel the need to reply to the above statements, you may do so but I
do ask you make them final and I ask that any further discussion is left
offline. I will not add subsequent replies past this point out of respect
to the community.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
