Of course, that is the strength of LMMS. But LMMS also needs to strive to meet the needs of composers. Sadly, this is not 2011 with all the good techno. It's the "EDM" age where vocals are now *heavily* used. I understand that you guys must prioritize as we do have some ground to cover as a basic program as the developer count isn't that optimal right now; per contra, it might serve to at least spend a little bit of time on rolling out sampling(they have spent time on making the code, they've gotten pretty far as well) in order to attract new users. And more users means more fame and more fame means more developers. You have *no idea* how many bits and pieces it takes to *simply play an audio *file lest record it and put it into the program in an editable form, these guys are *working full speed* in order to give you the best program despite their hectic lives.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 4:15 AM Johannes Janssens via LMMS-devel < lmms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > But I think LMMS is ment to be a real MIDI GUI. The solution with f.i. > Audacity works fine. What I hope for into the futur is a more elaborated > midi input GUI (without external hardware).This is the mainreason I like > LMMS and the idea that LMMS is concentrating on MIDI input. > Op 6/12/2018 om 5:23 schreef jaylyn wilson: > > Hi, I don't know if this will get to the company but add an audio recorder > and some new features. > > > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing > listLMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel > > -- > *Johannes Janssens* > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel >
_______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
