And I suggest making it decentralized and just posting our working copies on
the list.

..as opposed to sending them to people, who possibly don't check their
e-mail very often. So we can always work on the best version available

2010/6/8 Tres Finocchiaro <fatbuttla...@gmail.com>

> No, but I'd be interested in helping where I can.
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Janne Sinisalo <janne.m.sinis...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Also, it's for the 0.4.90 branch, so probably won't work with <0.4.90
>>
>> 2010/6/8 Janne Sinisalo <janne.m.sinis...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Hey,
>>>
>>> I was thinking about making a collaborated LMMS demo track which uses at
>>> least most of the current LMMS features. No one on the IRC channel was
>>> available/able to work on this so I'll just put this here and see what
>>> happens.
>>>
>>> Also, anyone else for starting a little project for renewing/cleaning the
>>> bundled sample/preset pack? o/
>>>
>>>        JS
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
>> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
>> lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win:
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lmms-users mailing list
>> Lmms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Lmms-users mailing list
Lmms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-users

Reply via email to