On 10 January 2014 08:34, Tobias Doerffel <tobias.doerf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To be clear: not the old master branch but either a new one we're going to > create or even better: stable-0.4! Otherwise the patches won't apply. > IMHO we should go away from the concept of stable and development branches. > Instead there should be one branch where stabilized feature branches get > merged in. Every N weeks there should be a release. Of course we can still > provide an experimental branch where all feature branches regularly get > merged in (for users wanting to use bleeding edge unstable LMMS) but > development should not happen against this experimental/master branch. Excellent! Will the distro package maintainers be able to keep up with this? (Will the distros let them?) - d. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Lmms-users mailing list Lmms-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-users
