On October 12, 2012 05:02:52 PM Florian Jung wrote:
> Am 30.09.2012 19:55, schrieb WillyFoobar:
> > Hello together,
> > 
> > this weekend I had the time to download and check the
> > muse-2.0.1.tar.gz for compile time warnings.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> thanks, i've committed the changes to trunk.
> 
> please mail us a patch (generated by "svn diff" in the trunk directory
> (or whatever branch you were on)) the next time, this is much easier to
> apply.
> 
> i wasn't able to locate the places in midi.cpp where you had changes;
> what did you mean there?
> 
> greetings
> flo

Thanks Willy!
And thanks Flo.

I too have fixed a few places before, for
 virtual destructors.

Virtual destructors seem to be a sort of
 grey area, often having their own chapter
 in books. They seem like the defacto thing
 to do yet for some reason they seem
 misunderstood and seem to have reasons why
 they need to be treated different from
 other virtual methods.

In other words there's more to the story 
 with virtual destructors than there is
 with other virtual methods.
Something about the calling sequence
 if I recall...

Thanks. Tim.
 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Lmuse-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer

Reply via email to