That's excellent news Tim!

I'm very happy to hear you enjoyed working on the VST support and
pleasantly surprised to hear that it may make it into 2.1. I got your
message within an hour or so of me updating my 'Initial thoughts on Muse
2.0' thread on the LM forums in which I mentioned I expected to see VST
support in MusE 2.2 so dunno if you saw my update and it spurred you to
reply?

http://www.linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=10012&start=15

I really hope LV2 is as much fun for you to add although I expect its going
to be much more of a slog. drobilla himself wrote the LV2 support for A3
and has helped Rui get it working in qtractor but I don't think it came
easy - for a start LV2 comprises of about 4 or 5 fundamental but distinct
libs these days. I hope my suspicions are unfounded!

Looking forward to testing it soon - thanks!

On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Tim E. Real <[email protected]> wrote:

> On November 25, 2012 03:51:40 AM Tim E. Real wrote:
> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/53315356/native_vst_first_run.png
> >
> > http://www.mucoder.net/en/tonespace/
> >
> > Tim.
>
>
> Hello friends.
> Soon will be back from my long twisted journey.
> Yessirree, have I got some stories to tell...
>
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/53315356/native_vst_now_we_are_cooking.png
>
> In answer to Dan's question: Yes, you can see from the pic that it is
>  quite usable, and enjoyable. You can see ALL the synths are going at once
>  in the mixer strips as I play my midi KB. Some are feeding into others
>  because they are really not synths but midi-capable effects.
>
> This is only the synthesizers. Sorry, no rack plugins yet. I strategically
>  chose to work on the synths first, because any effects can be loaded as
>  synth tracks for now as I work ahead. Rack plugins will be more difficult.
>
> Robert, em, I reckon should be a few more days 'till the synths are ready.
> Would you mind terribly if we throw this in, and do an RC2 sometime later,
>  giving sometime to check it out?
>
> It is as unobtrusive as possible. Most of the work is in the new vst_native
>  module, of course.
> But there are some important bugs fixes here and there, with DSSI as well.
>
> And... there is one big crucial fundamental change:
> Another step has been taken in unifying plugins and synths classes:
>
> Old class structure:
> -------------------------------------------
>
> class PluginIBase
>
> class PluginI : public PluginIBase
>
> class SynthIF
>
> class DssiSynthIF : public PluginIBase, public SynthIF
>
> class MessSynthIF : public SynthIF
>
> class MetronomeSynthIF : public SynthIF
>
>  and so on.
>
> New class structure:
> -------------------------------------------
>
> class PluginIBase
>
> class PluginI : public PluginIBase
>
> class SynthIF : public PluginIBase
>
> class DssiSynthIF : public SynthIF
>
> class MessSynthIF : public SynthIF
>
> class MetronomeSynthIF : public SynthIF
>
> class VstNativeSynthIF : public SynthIF         (Yep, got it)
>
> class LV2SynthIF : public SynthIF                               (He he,
> later...)
>
>  and so on.
>
> It took me about an hour to do it and worked great first try,
>  because I already knew that the merger of
>  PluginIBase and any *SynthIF was going to work -
>  as demonstrated in DssiSynthIF !
>
> I did it because you'll notice it was not possible to cast directly
>  from SynthIF to PluginIBase without UGLY casts to DssiSynthIF first,
>  then down to PluginIBase. There were several places doing that,
>  requiring ugly dssi-specific #ifdef  DSSI_SUPPORT and so on.
>
> Knowing that we would be adding not one, not two, but THREE new
>  synth types, I did not relish the thought of adding THREE more dedicated
>  sections to all of those places ! So I made it all proper.
>
> So, um, ye' see, it means our MESS synths *could* now use all the
>  floating-point goodness of the PluginI class, if ye' so desire...
> By default, in SynthIF, all the base methods from PluginI are 'blank',
>  so ye' need not worry about supporting PluginI features at all.
>
> Trust me, it will rock. I will only get better. Wait 'till you see the
>  automation features VST brings.
> Hey Florian, if you're out there, VST has 'begin/end automation' signals
>  that happen when a control is pressed or released. Remember when
>  we struggled with that? The 'luxury' of those two signals? It really
> works!
>
> Which brings me to my closing thought:
> I said THREE new synth types above. Native VST, LV2, ... and the third?
> With respect to VST, Robert said it best: All the best ones are Win
> plugins.
>
> So I leave you with this tantalizing idea:
> I'd like to study integrating Wine-VST support right into MusE.
> I hope that all we need is one Wine-built module to do all the Win-specific
>  code. And the rest, well it'll be integrated right into MusE just like the
>  Native VST stuff. Giving full access to all the features, and the full VST
>  callback etc.
>
> Really, having just spent the week up to my neck in
>  DSSI-VST, FST, Native VST, and QTractor code, I think that it would
>  be possible, even trivial now.
> Not sure yet, but we could try the DSSI-VST way and use a server,
>  or try the FST way and build right in.
> Essentially, what I mean is DSSI-VST ... bypassing the DSSI part !
>
> Hope LV2 is as fun... Gotta go now.
>
> Cheers. Tim.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel:
> INSIGHTS What's next for parallel hardware, programming and related areas?
> Interviews and blogs by thought leaders keep you ahead of the curve.
> http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
> _______________________________________________
> Lmuse-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-user
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: 
INSIGHTS What's next for parallel hardware, programming and related areas?
Interviews and blogs by thought leaders keep you ahead of the curve.
http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Lmuse-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer

Reply via email to