On January 2, 2013 09:47:14 AM Geoff Beasley wrote: > Tim, could we average these meters out slower or make it adjustable > somehow? They "twitter" way too fast imo and actually it makes them > harder to read accurately with short peak transients. It's tha falloff > rate that needs adjusting only. > > Doing the vocals for this tune now - be finished in about an hour or so ;) > > > cheers. > > g. >
Sure for midi, and possibly for audio as well we could add falloff. We are also missing db (audio) or velo (midi) markings of any kind. Not even any numerical readouts. Not even any tick marks. Been eying that one for a while... Can you do me a favour and submit to the Feature Requests or do a semi-bug report (which I tend to read more often). Meters are low priority for me right now, but whenever I have spare time I try to read the tracker lists and fix what I can. Maybe someone else would want to tackle it too. Remember when I helped with Mudita24 (the Envy24 ICE1712 card mixer), and Fons and the gang were helping out on LAD, and we discovered the sliders had unwanted detent positions as you *move* them? That's a GTK 'feature' of their sliders. But it was annoying in that mixer. So I had to go in there and get rid of the detents when *moving* the slider but managed to keep them for *key* shortcuts. So, the keyboard detents line up (almost) perfectly with the slider markings, you know like 0db 3db 6db etc. Anyway, just some thoughts for the ultimate sliders. Tim. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts. SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612 _______________________________________________ Lmuse-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer
