On January 20, 2013 08:07:03 PM Florian Jung wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> i was just trying to exactly align a wave file in the wave editor;
> however, i seem to be only able to align it tick-exact, but not frame-exact.
> 
> i tried this with latest trunk.
> 
> My steps were:
> Create Wavetrack, import .wav file. (a wave part will show up)
> zoom in the arranger, move the part. this doesn't work frame-exact
> because the zoom is still too far away.
> double-click the part, the wave editor opens
> zoom in, the zoom is near enough.
> select the "pointer" tool, and move the wave event
> 
> expected result: it moves frame-accurate
> actual result: it moves in steps of 1 tick.
> 
> what am I doing wrong?

Nothing. MusE currently only aligns by ticks.

The wave editor time scale says frames, but really the underlying
 alignment is in ticks only.

This whole mess is part of what my branch tries to deal with.
Selectable timescale modes and true alignment to the timescales, 
 be they in ticks or frames.

Your only option for frame alignment at the moment is to try my 
 recently added function in the wave editor "adjust wave offset" 
 which /is/ in units of frames. 
(Yeah I trashed the entire WaveView class and replaced it with a 
 proper WaveCanvas class *just* for this very important feature!)
But it does not adjust 'forward', only 'backward' (moves to the left).
It was meant mainly as a quick solution for correcting recorded latency.
It simply adjusts the wave event's frame offset member, which has 
 always been there.
However the offset member is also touched when you 'split' a wave part.
So it can be a cumbersome to work with after a split, as I discovered 
 the other day. The offset value can be a really large number after a split,
 so I was thinking of adding an /additional/ user offset, beyond the
 existing offset value used for splitting, so that the user sees only 
 the component of the offset contributed by them, and not the complete
 very large value.

Tim.

> 
> 
> (btw, in branches/poslen_changes, there is my approach for making ticks
> more accurate and for letting wave data be aligned on ticks/subticks,
> not on samples. have a look at it, it's a very very early POC but it
> already works... a bit ;) )
> 
> greetings
> flo

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412
_______________________________________________
Lmuse-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer

Reply via email to