Hi Robert, As for me, I like this idea. C++11 will give us more freedom to use new constructs, stl types etc.. Only one built-in atomic and regexp types costs all doubts!
-- Regards, Andrew > Hi guys, > > I'm doing some research into exchanging our current thread communication > (since pipe/poll isn't so portable to Windows mostly) and I stumbled on > this: > https://github.com/cameron314/readerwriterqueue > > Which may or may not be a sweet solution, I'm mucking around and trying > things mostly. > > Anyway, this queue, and most other solutions I found, seems to rely on the > new <atomic> stuff in c++11 so I thought I would ask your opinion on > raising the requirements to a compiler that supports c++11 (atleast > partially)? > > Historically I guess we have been reluctant to use new stuff but then again > c++11, or even c++0x has been around for a while atleast. > I see this queue requires gcc4.7, as there is apparently a bug in 4.6, > which puts us at sometime 2012. > Is this a limiting requirement in your opinion? > > Regards, > Robert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Lmuse-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmuse-developer
