On 2014-08-21 16:21, Bill Fischofer wrote: > Please publish as it is complete and useful in its own right and accurately > reflects what was submitted for LNG-SC approval. Then open a bug for the > rework. The rework you suggest is non-trivial and is non-gating here. > Thanks.
Does anyone else have any ideas how to handle this? Cheers, Anders > > Bill > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Anders Roxell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On 2014-08-21 15:37, Bill Fischofer wrote: > > > The argument is understood, however it's not what we did for the crypto > > API > > > and the CARD for this activity has already been closed. We should > > publish > > > this now and then create a new CARD for the restructure as part of the > > > classification implementation work. These are not final docs, simply > > "exit > > > design phase" docs. > > > > That is true, Robbie started the crypto implementation for linux-generic > > before we had the architecture doc for it. > > > > This is the first time we actually does it the "correct" way. > > Starting with the architecture doc and then, start the implementation. > > Thats why it is more important to have the .h file to guide people. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
