> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:lng-odp-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of ext Mike Holmes
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:54 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH] odp_shared_memory.h: Document odp_shm_reserve
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Holmes <[email protected]>
> ---
>  platform/linux-generic/include/api/odp_shared_memory.h | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/platform/linux-generic/include/api/odp_shared_memory.h
> b/platform/linux-generic/include/api/odp_shared_memory.h
> index 8ac8847..d75b179 100644
> --- a/platform/linux-generic/include/api/odp_shared_memory.h
> +++ b/platform/linux-generic/include/api/odp_shared_memory.h
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ extern "C" {
> 
>  #include <odp_std_types.h>
> 
> -/** Maximum shared memory block name lenght in chars */
> +/** Maximum shared memory block name length in chars */
>  #define ODP_SHM_NAME_LEN 32
> 
> 
> @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ extern "C" {
>   * @param align  Block alignment in bytes
>   *
>   * @return Pointer to the reserved block, or NULL
> + *
> + * @note The same block name cannot be reused.
> + * @note There is no way to unreserve a named block

I think there will be a odp_shm_release call. So I'd not put that last note 
there...otherwise half of the current API should be noted about missing 
features.

-Petri

>   */
>  void *odp_shm_reserve(const char *name, uint64_t size, uint64_t align);
> 
> --
> 1.9.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lng-odp mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to