On 2014-09-04 09:23, Taras Kondratiuk wrote: > On 09/03/2014 09:14 PM, Robbie King (robking) wrote: > > Taras, do you have a bug ID for the "IPSEC_POLL_QUEUES" workaround? > > Anders has requested that be included in my IPsec application patch. > > Anders, why do you think it need to be tracked as a bug? It is just a > different way of using API. Not all applications must use scheduler > API. We have the same in all our packet examples.
I just had a problem with this sentence: "Some platforms require a temporary hack to get around using odp_schedule" "temporary hack" in my ears that should be a bug, maybe we can rename it and say that this isn't a hack? and I asked if this should be a bug. Cheers, Anders _______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
