Shouldn't we have a TODO or FIXME comment in the code (odp_crypto_session_destroy)? Some well-defined text that can easily be searched for?
On 11 September 2014 03:10, Victor Kamensky <[email protected]> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Victor Kamensky <[email protected]> > --- > platform/linux-generic/include/api/odp_crypto.h | 2 ++ > platform/linux-generic/odp_crypto.c | 9 +++++++++ > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/platform/linux-generic/include/api/odp_crypto.h > b/platform/linux-generic/include/api/odp_crypto.h > index 9220fb5..918249a 100644 > --- a/platform/linux-generic/include/api/odp_crypto.h > +++ b/platform/linux-generic/include/api/odp_crypto.h > @@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ odp_crypto_session_create(odp_crypto_session_params_t > *params, > odp_crypto_session_t *session, > enum odp_crypto_ses_create_err *status); > > +int odp_crypto_session_destroy(odp_crypto_session_t ses); > + > /** > * Crypto session creation (asynchronous) > * > diff --git a/platform/linux-generic/odp_crypto.c > b/platform/linux-generic/odp_crypto.c > index ef91a34..15aeb51 100644 > --- a/platform/linux-generic/odp_crypto.c > +++ b/platform/linux-generic/odp_crypto.c > @@ -472,3 +472,12 @@ odp_crypto_get_operation_compl_packet(odp_buffer_t > completion_event) > { > return odp_packet_from_buffer(completion_event); > } > + > +int odp_crypto_session_destroy(odp_crypto_session_t ses ODP_UNUSED) > +{ > + /* > + * Just stub for now, there is no clean short way to reclaim > + * slot of odp_crypto_global_t.sessions > + */ > + return 0; > +} > -- > 1.8.1.4 > > > _______________________________________________ > lng-odp mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >
_______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
