I think that given the lack of a clear reason to pick branches or repos and
the spread of opinion the new proposed maintainers should pick, Maxim are
you going to lead that effort ?

Maxim - generic
Venki - DPDK
Taras - KS2
Ciprian - Netmap

I think that for all the public implementations we have we want the same
approach across them don't we ?






On 22 September 2014 01:48, Maxim Uvarov <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's the same discussion going online and offline here. I will try to draw
> scheme for git repos and branches to be more clear what will be merged from
> where.
>
> Maxim.
>
>
> On 09/20/2014 04:05 AM, Jacob, Jerin wrote:
>
>> On Sep 19, 2014 4:18 PM, Taras Kondratiuk <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/19/2014 02:28 PM, Jacob, Jerin wrote:
>>>
>>>> How about git "submodules", A master git odp repo and platforms specific
>>>> sub repos within it.Best of both worlds.
>>>>
>>>> ​http://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Submodules
>>>>
>>> I had very unpleasant experience with git submodules.
>>> Better to go with a repo tool and host a manifest with open
>>> implementations.
>>>
>> Both tools are used for supporting repo inside repo workflow. Yes, repo
>> may be a good choice(Widely used in  android community)
>> _______________________________________________
>> lng-odp mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lng-odp mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>



-- 
*Mike Holmes*
Linaro Technical Manager / Lead
LNG - ODP
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to