Yes. I would prefer ODP_ABORT("message") this call can be used by the
application so that there is no need to provide two separate calls for
ODP_ERR and abort().Regards, Bala On 22 September 2014 09:14, Mike Holmes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 22 September 2014 11:54, Bala Manoharan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Mike, >> >> I would not prefer LOG functions to call abort() on behalf of the >> application, >> > Np, If we want a new name that is fine, I wondered how many ODP_ERRs would > be seriously considered ERR or a FATAL > The purpose is to ensure there is no need of calls to exit in the > implementations, so any ideas on a good name? From the above possibly > ODP_FATAL? > We also then need to update > http://docs.opendataplane.org/arch/html/exception_handling.html to make > it clearer. > > this design prevents the applications from calling its specific clean-up >> code. coz applications can be written in a way in which clean-up can be >> done in a single place at the end of the main function combining all the >> lock-release and clean-up for different calls. >> >> Is there any specific requirement for this design? >> >> Regards, >> Bala >> > > > > -- > *Mike Holmes* > Linaro Technical Manager / Lead > LNG - ODP >
_______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
