On 10 December 2014 at 13:46, Robbie King (robking) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ola, I don't think ODP necessarily needs to support > older versions of GCC, but if the GCC configure finds > is not compatible it would be nice to fail then as opposed > to cryptic build failures. OK. Because I could have added backwards compatibility with degraded performance but I'd rather not.
> > -----Original Message----- > From: Ola Liljedahl [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:32 AM > To: Robbie King (robking) > Cc: lng-odp-forward ([email protected]) > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] Build failure with older GCC versions... > > On 9 December 2014 at 17:48, Robbie King (robking) <[email protected]> wrote: >> After cloning tip just now, I found that I couldn’t build the fresh >> >> workspace due to having GCC 4.6.3 (the C11 changes to the atomics >> >> bumps minimum GCC up to 4.8 as best I can tell). I’m not very familiar > GCC 4.7 according to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html > > Is support for older versions of GCC needed? > >> >> with what “./configure” can and can’t do, but it seems we should verify >> >> the compiler supports these constructs and fail during the configure >> >> phase (as opposed to build time). >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Robbie >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lng-odp mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >> _______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
