sorry for the noise - I posted from the test sandbox - has the old cover
letter and spelling on subject Bill noticed
will repost

On 19 December 2014 at 15:34, Mike Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:

> The 1.0 API delta doc specifies that odp_schedule_one should be removed.
> This series does that. In doing so it is expedient to just delete the timer
> example because it is a poor example and there are patches under
> consideration
> that improve the timer implementation and replace this bad example.
>
> NOTE requires patch linux-generic: example: update timer test for new
> buffer pools
>
> v2: retain current odp_timer_test
>
> Mike Holmes (3):
>   example: odp_example: remove use of odp_schdule_one
>   example: odp_timer_test: remove use of odp_schdule_one
>   api: schedule: remove odp_schedule_one
>
>  example/odp_example/odp_example.c                 | 140
> ----------------------
>  example/timer/odp_timer_test.c                    |   2 +-
>  platform/linux-generic/include/api/odp_schedule.h |  25 ----
>  platform/linux-generic/odp_schedule.c             |  12 --
>  4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 178 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.1.0
>
>


-- 
*Mike Holmes*
Linaro  Sr Technical Manager
LNG - ODP
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to