Hi Ola, you have a lot of great questions here.  We are getting

into areas of crypto that I know little if any about.  I think

we are going to need a better owner than myself for crypto going

forward.

From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 11:49 AM
To: Ola Liljedahl
Cc: Robbie King (robking); LNG ODP Mailman List
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] questions on crypto.h

Leonard mentioned in one of the calls a couple of weeks back that he had a 
proposed patch to extend the range of cipher suites.  Now that v1.0 is out 
perhaps he can comment on whether that can be brought forward?

And yes, NULL is valid cipher algorithm.  It's what's typically specified when 
authentication only is needed since encryption/authentication are paired 
concepts.  An authenticated public document is a prime example of the use of 
NULL ciphers.

On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Ola Liljedahl 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
 * @enum odp_cipher_alg:ODP_CIPHER_ALG_NULL
 * No cipher algorithm specified

Is this comment correct?
Don't we actually mean "Null cipher algorithm"?
The null algorithm is a valid cipher algorithm, it just doesn't
provide much security....

Should we define ciphers like AES well? Didn't the original crypto
proposal specify a more complete  of cipher algorithms?

Does the crypto implementation have to know about the mode (e.g. CBC,
CTR)? Cipher 3DES is defined with CBC mode. For counter mode each
block has its own counter value and it could be specified by the user
if each block is passed for encryption/decryption separately. How
large is a block supposed to be? A packet?

Can crypto.h be extended to asymmetric (public/private key)
encryption/decryption as well? Do we need new calls and data
structures or just some new enums?

-- Ola

_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to