On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Anders Roxell <[email protected]> wrote: > I will send a version 2 and not remove "tags".
What about cscope.out? Anyone else using cscope? > > Cheers, > > > On 24 March 2015 at 10:45, Anders Roxell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 24 March 2015 at 10:21, Maxim Uvarov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 03/24/15 00:20, Anders Roxell wrote: >>>> >>>> Correct gitignore when using ctags generated by make >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> .gitignore | 2 +- >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore >>>> index 3d74f23..2a90e7d 100644 >>>> --- a/.gitignore >>>> +++ b/.gitignore >>>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ libtool >>>> pkgconfig/libodp.pc >>>> .deps/ >>>> cscope.out >>>> -tags >>>> +TAGS >>>> lib/ >>>> doc/output >>>> test-driver >>> >>> Why did you remove tags? I use 'ctags -R .' it generates tags file. And >>> I don't want to have it in staged files to commit. >> >> >> I use that as well for other project that don't have tags, ctags as a >> build target. >> But I think we should promote the built-in functionality if there is one. >> >> Cheers, >> Anders >> >>> >>> >>> Maxim. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lng-odp mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > lng-odp mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp > _______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
