On 04/07/2015 12:40 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 12:01:30PM +0300, Taras Kondratiuk wrote:
On 04/06/2015 07:41 PM, Bill Fischofer wrote:
I would call these "pool groups" for symmetry with "queue groups" and so
the API would be odp_pool_create_group(), odp_pool_destroy_group(), etc.
If it is called "pool group", then it sounds like a separate
abstraction. Which in turn needs a separate type and new API functions
to destroy or attach to somewhere (pktio, CoS, etc.).
We have introduced the new classification term ODP_PMR_LEN to
address "Segmentation optimization" use case by attaching
different pools based on packet len.
Are we introducing the new composite pool schematics because
ODP_PMR_LEN cannot implemented in hardware ?
Hi Jerin,
I've described in this thread why ODP_PMR_LEN does not address
this use-case correctly. It sets too strict classification rules,
which are not needed in this use-case.
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
