Merged,
Maxim.

On 04/06/15 15:21, Bill Fischofer wrote:
No problem with that as a reason, so:

Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Mike Holmes <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On 6 April 2015 at 08:00, Bill Fischofer
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



        On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Mike Holmes
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Fixes CID 89196

            Signed-off-by: Mike Holmes <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>>
            ---
             test/validation/classification/odp_classification_tests.c
            | 7 ++++---
             1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

            diff --git
            a/test/validation/classification/odp_classification_tests.c 
b/test/validation/classification/odp_classification_tests.c
            index 0530f99..1bf080f 100644
            ---
            a/test/validation/classification/odp_classification_tests.c
            +++
            b/test/validation/classification/odp_classification_tests.c
            @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static int
            cls_pkt_set_seq(odp_packet_t pkt)
                    static uint32_t seq;
                    cls_test_packet_t data;
                    uint32_t offset;
            +       int status;

                    data.magic = DATA_MAGIC;
                    data.seq = ++seq;
            @@ -133,10 +134,10 @@ static int
            cls_pkt_set_seq(odp_packet_t pkt)
                    offset = odp_packet_l4_offset(pkt);
                    CU_ASSERT_FATAL(offset != 0);

            -  odp_packet_copydata_in(pkt, offset + ODPH_UDPHDR_LEN,
            - sizeof(data), &data);
            +       status = odp_packet_copydata_in(pkt, offset +
            ODPH_UDPHDR_LEN,
            +        sizeof(data), &data);


        Wouldn't it be simpler to say:

        return odp_packet_copydata_in(...);  ?


    I find it easier to read a return which is not also a function call.
    I also find it easier to single step in a debugger with this
    because I can stop in the function after the call more clearly.

            -       return 0;
            +       return status;
             }

             static uint32_t cls_pkt_get_seq(odp_packet_t pkt)
            --
            2.1.0

            _______________________________________________
            lng-odp mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp





-- Mike Holmes
    Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group
    Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/>***│ *Open source software for
    ARM SoCs




_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to