On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 02:04:08PM -0400, Mike Holmes wrote: > I think odph is named odph precisely becasue they are not core APIs. > I think it is a valid separate question if some of the odph members should > be in the full API. >
So that's a separate discussion which is now continuing in another thread. In the meantime, can this patch be reviewed on the basis that it's not making an API change? -- Stuart. > > On 3 April 2015 at 08:04, Maxim Uvarov <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 04/02/15 18:21, Stuart Haslam wrote: > > > >> -void odph_linux_pthread_create(odph_linux_pthread_t *thread_tbl, > >> +int odph_linux_pthread_create(odph_linux_pthread_t *thread_tbl, > >> > > That is is interesting do we consider helper API change as ODP API change > > or not. > > > > Maxim. > > _______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
