Are we happy with this output from the test?

I think the owner is well known, and adding "Linaro/LNG" feels wrong to me
- do people feel strongly that we add an owner

ODP API version: 1.0.4
ODP implementation version: linux-generic 1.0.4-0 (v1.0.4) May  6
201507:54:33


On 6 May 2015 at 07:06, Mike Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On 6 May 2015 at 03:30, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is pure implementation change and thus does not belong to api-next
>> (but master).
>
>
> I agree the code is implementation, but the change in the release
> numbering is significant and coupled to the doc
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jCWRW9yHbzNp8dmZ1X8ZNQB1YzKyZbipoYY101Uhkhg/edit>
>  clarification
> so I wanted to make sure it was seen by all/ This has to be in 1.1.0
>
>
>> Also the string could contain more information, à la Linux "uname -a" e.g.
>>
>> linux-generic:
>> "Linaro/LNG linux-generic 1.0.1-5 (ODP v1.0.1) Wed May 6 10:17:46 UTC
>> 2015"
>>
>> linux-dpdk:
>> "Linaro/LNG linux-dpdk 1.0.1-13 (ODP v1.0.1, DPDK v1.8) Fri May 15
>> 17:05:55 UTC 2015"
>>
>>
>> The minimum string would be "linux-generic 1.0.1-5", but I think it's
>> good to explicitly list ODP API version, DPDK (and other strict lib)
>> version dependency, the organization and build date. It's helps bug
>> reporting/etc, when it's clear which API version/code base/build the user
>>  is running.
>>
>
> Sure, lets add platform to the string and build date to linux -generic,
> the dpdk platform can add DPDK version.
>
>
>>
>>
>> -Petri
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: lng-odp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>> ext
>> > Mike Holmes
>> > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 9:44 PM
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Subject: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] linux-generic: odp_impl: concatenate
>> > api version with implementation version
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Mike Holmes <[email protected]>
>> > ---
>> >  platform/linux-generic/odp_impl.c | 6 +++++-
>> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/platform/linux-generic/odp_impl.c b/platform/linux-
>> > generic/odp_impl.c
>> > index ca3224d..a182bc6 100644
>> > --- a/platform/linux-generic/odp_impl.c
>> > +++ b/platform/linux-generic/odp_impl.c
>> > @@ -21,7 +21,11 @@ extern "C" {
>> >  #include <odp/version.h>
>> >
>> >  #define  ODP_VERSION_IMPL 0
>> > -#define  ODP_VERSION_IMPL_STR ODP_VERSION_TO_STR(ODP_VERSION_IMPL)
>> > +#define  ODP_VERSION_IMPL_STR \
>> > +      ODP_VERSION_TO_STR(ODP_VERSION_API_GENERATION) "." \
>> > +      ODP_VERSION_TO_STR(ODP_VERSION_API_MAJOR) "." \
>> > +      ODP_VERSION_TO_STR(ODP_VERSION_API_MINOR) "-" \
>> > +      ODP_VERSION_TO_STR(ODP_VERSION_IMPL)
>> >
>> >  const char *odp_version_impl_str(void)
>> >  {
>> > --
>> > 2.1.4
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > lng-odp mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mike Holmes
> Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group
> Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
>
>


-- 
Mike Holmes
Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group
Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to