On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:20:23AM +0100, Stuart Haslam wrote:
>
>Yup, I too am not sure that it's a good idea to install tests via
>"make install", but that's what was being done before your change and it
>(kind of) worked.

Oh, hmmm.

>We do need some method of installing test binaries, to cope with
>cross-building, where the tests can't be run on the machine they were
>built on. As discussed yesterday I think the right thing to do is create
>another target named install-test which installs just the test binaries
>and any supporting scripts, but that can be done later and for this
>series all that's required is not to introduce a regression.

There's also maybe some use in installing the *source* for some of the
tests as examples alongside documentation. But definitely the tests
themselves shouldn't be installed using "make install"...

Cheers,
-- 
Steve McIntyre                                [email protected]
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs

_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to