On 8 June 2015 at 17:29, Maxim Uvarov <[email protected]> wrote:

> Jerin, please include Ola's reviewed-by to updated patch.
>
Be careful with copy&paste as I copied a reviewed-by from Bill and changed
the name (the text I could see) but I now see that somehow the mail URL
still contains Bill's email!

 -- Ola


> Thanks,
> Maxim.
>
> On 06/08/15 18:24, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
>
>> Approved with one comment below.
>>
>> On 5 June 2015 at 09:52, Jerin Jacob <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     otherwise "tt[i].tick" in "handle_tmo" will be a wrong value
>>     in case timer set failed due to
>>     ODP_TIMER_NOEVENT(failed to cancel the outstanding timer).
>>
>>     some hardware timer implementations needs at least two ticks gap
>>     between
>>     "current tick" and "future tick" to cancel the outstanding active
>>     timer.
>>
>>     Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl <[email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]>>
>>
>>
>>     ---
>>      test/validation/odp_timer.c | 6 +++---
>>      1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>>     diff --git a/test/validation/odp_timer.c b/test/validation/odp_timer.c
>>     index 554b353..852343a 100644
>>     --- a/test/validation/odp_timer.c
>>     +++ b/test/validation/odp_timer.c
>>     @@ -365,9 +365,9 @@ static void *worker_entrypoint(void *arg
>>     TEST_UNUSED)
>>                             } else if (rc != ODP_TIMER_SUCCESS) {
>>                                     /* Set/reset failed, timer already
>>     expired */
>>                                     ntoolate++;
>>     -                       }
>>     -                       /* Save expected expiration tick */
>>     -                       tt[i].tick = cur_tick + tck;
>>     +                       } else if (rc == ODP_TIMER_SUCCESS)
>>     +                               /* Save expected expiration tick
>>     on success */
>>     +                               tt[i].tick = cur_tick + tck;
>>
>> Should enclose in { } as other if/else-branches use braces.
>>
>>                   }
>>                     struct timespec ts;
>>                     ts.tv_sec = 0;
>>     --
>>     2.1.0
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     lng-odp mailing list
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lng-odp mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lng-odp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to