So no objections about patch itself?

Maxim.

On 07/23/15 20:23, Mike Holmes wrote:


On 23 July 2015 at 13:03, Stuart Haslam <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:43:01PM -0400, Mike Holmes wrote:
    > sing patch:
    lng-odp_API-NEXT_PATCH_validation_common_fix_VPATH_builds.mbox
    >   Trying to apply patch
    >   Patch applied
    > ERROR: Remove Gerrit Change-Id's before submitting upstream.
    > #8:
    > Change-Id: Icc73306eabc211cbb77d4fa57d493f7ebbea7447
    >
    > We need to make changes to checkpatch possibly, looks like there
    are some
    > interactions with gerrit

    Hrm, yes this is because of a commit hook I added to insert the
    Change-Id required for gerrit. I suppose I could've removed it before
    sending to the list, but there doesn't seem much point. checkpatch is
    complaining because they don't want Change-Ids in the kernel git log,
    but if we're merging changes directly via gerrit we're going to have
    them (unless there's some way to strip them on merge?).

    It's going to look a bit messy if we're not consistent though, so does
    that mean all changes need a Change-Id?.. and what about when changes
    from api-next get merged to master (which doesn't use gerrit). Oof.


I don’t think they do any harm and I don’t think it matters if some patches have an ID and others don’t. They just look like another line on the sign off list and that has an arbitrary number of sign offs already.





    > On 23 July 2015 at 11:33, Stuart Haslam
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >
    > > libs are in $(top_builddir) rather than $(top_srcdir).
    > >
    > > Change-Id: Icc73306eabc211cbb77d4fa57d493f7ebbea7447
    > > Signed-off-by: Stuart Haslam <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    > >
    >
    > Assuming that for ODP we will not mind gerrit IDs - I don’t see
    a reason to
    > worry about them,  but open to education :)
    > Reviewed-by: Mike Holmes <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    >
    >
    > > ---
    > >  test/validation/Makefile.inc | 4 ++--
    > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
    > >
    > > diff --git a/test/validation/Makefile.inc
    b/test/validation/Makefile.inc
    > > index 439a304..ac80814 100644
    > > --- a/test/validation/Makefile.inc
    > > +++ b/test/validation/Makefile.inc
    > > @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
    > >  include $(top_srcdir)/test/Makefile.inc
    > >
    > > -COMMON_DIR = $(top_srcdir)/test/validation/common
    > > +COMMON_DIR = $(top_builddir)/test/validation/common
    > >
    > > -AM_CFLAGS += -I$(COMMON_DIR)
    > > +AM_CFLAGS += -I$(top_srcdir)/test/validation/common
    > >  AM_LDFLAGS += -static
    > >
    > >  LIBCUNIT_COMMON = $(COMMON_DIR)/libcunit_common.la
    <http://libcunit_common.la>
    > > --
    > > 2.1.1
    > >
    > > _______________________________________________
    > > lng-odp mailing list
    > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    > > https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
    > >




--
Mike Holmes
Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group
Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/>***│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs



_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to