From: EXT Mike Holmes [mailto:mike.hol...@linaro.org] Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 3:43 PM To: Christophe Milard Cc: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo); lng-odp Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v3 3/7] api: doc: re-organize doxygen doc for synchronizer
On 23 October 2015 at 08:40, Christophe Milard <christophe.mil...@linaro.org<mailto:christophe.mil...@linaro.org>> wrote: Well, I agree that the test environment should not prevent API improvement: The test environment should simply follow the API as it moves. I see no problem with this change as long as the test environment follows it. I do see a problem, though, if it does not... What structure should the test environment have then? none? This is an api-next patch so it could go in and wait for the follow-up, but history is starting to show that doing this is starting to leave api-next changes floating that cannot be merged to master because no one addresses the gating items. If we take this in I think we need to make a bug to address the follow up. It fine to report a bug. Missing validation tests are easier to track with code coverage tools, etc. I choose to fix broken API documentation logic instead of just copying it (which would have been less work for us all). -Petri
_______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list lng-odp@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
