Can we merge [1] that was ready and reviewed last week with no objections Maxim Petri - can you review that patch and if there are changes needed I can update.
[1] [PATCH] doc: process-guide: add release process On 9 December 2015 at 04:35, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 12/09/2015 11:54, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote: > >> >> So, critical bug fixes from master side are not visible to api-next until >> a month or so? >> >> > Exactly. api-next was broken with TM. Until issue if fixed and branch > operates as usual, there is no pull of critical bug and etc. > https://ci.linaro.org/view/odp-ci/job/odp-api-check > > Now some people still see build fails with gcc4.9, but I can not reproduce > it and CI also passes. So only now I can pull changes from master. > > Maxim. > > > Most bug fixes should apply directly to api-next as well, since those are >> implementation/test code/build system fixes (not api changing fixes). Some >> fixes may touch the same lines that api-next have changed due to an api >> change (and would need more thinking), but generally that should not be the >> case. >> >> For example, without these fixes it’s impossible to write implementation >> (on api-next side) that is compatible to the API spec AND passes validation >> tests, since validation tests do not follow the spec. So, I could not send >> patches for api-next that follow the spec for one month (since ‘make check’ >> fails), OR I would need to include these same (or similar bug fix) patches >> in the front of my patch set. >> >> -Petri >> >> *From:*EXT Mike Holmes [mailto:mike.hol...@linaro.org] >> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 08, 2015 5:34 PM >> *To:* Maxim Uvarov >> *Cc:* Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo); lng-odp@lists.linaro.org >> *Subject:* Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH 00/10] Pktio checks >> >> The process states that API-NEXT takes master on master release points >> only. >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1kWkr2qBV4xbqOCXMDVsoINhdxaNeHC-8sCm6SBVFI8o/edit >> >> On 8 December 2015 at 09:48, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org >> <mailto:maxim.uva...@linaro.org>> wrote: >> >> On 12/08/2015 17:20, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote: >> >> Could you merge this into api-next ASAP. Just lost couple of >> hours in debugging these same malfunctioning tests. >> >> -Petri >> >> >> If you can merge that master and api-next I can. But for now after >> time things 2 branches out of sync in many files. >> >> Maxim. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org >> <mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org>] On Behalf Of EXT >> Maxim Uvarov >> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 4:14 PM >> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org >> > >> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH 00/10] Pktio checks >> >> Merged, >> Maxim. >> >> On 11/10/2015 18:49, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote: >> >> This series add several tests for pktios and fixes the >> issue they >> >> raised. >> >> The main features checked are: >> * RONLY pktio cannot be sent to >> * WONLY pktio cannot be read from >> * stopped pktio cannot be stopped >> * started pktio cannot be started >> * started pktio cannot be configured >> >> Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin (10): >> linux-generic: pktio: check interface mode is >> compatible before >> receiving or sending >> validation: pktio: add customizable out mode for >> pktios >> validation: pktio: add tests for rrecv() on WONLY, >> and send on RONLY >> pktios >> validation: pktio: stop interfaces before removing >> the default inq >> validation: pktio: remove unneeded stop as >> interface is stopped after >> open() >> validation: classification: start pktio after >> setting inq and stop it >> before removing it >> validation: classification: stronger checks to >> avoid SEGV on pktio >> failure >> linux-generic: pktio: check for pktio_start when >> started and >> pktio_stop when stopped >> linux-generic: pktio: configuration functions >> check that interface is >> stopped >> validation: pktio: add test for start when started >> and stop when >> stopped() >> >> platform/linux-generic/odp_packet_io.c | >> 25 ++++- >> .../classification/odp_classification_common.c | 2 + >> .../classification/odp_classification_test_pmr.c | >> 25 +++-- >> test/validation/pktio/pktio.c | 116 >> >> ++++++++++++++++++--- >> >> 4 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lng-odp mailing list >> lng-odp@lists.linaro.org <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org >> > >> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lng-odp mailing list >> lng-odp@lists.linaro.org <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org> >> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lng-odp mailing list >> lng-odp@lists.linaro.org <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org> >> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Mike Holmes >> >> Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group >> >> Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/>***│ *Open source software for ARM >> SoCs >> >> > -- Mike Holmes Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs
_______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list lng-odp@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
