I don't know how one can speak for "future readers" (whoever they might
be). I have no objection to the edit, but we should say that it's our rule,
not concern for posterity's sensibilities that motivates it. :)

On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Mike Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:

> We shouldn't mention the tool that found the issue in the subject, future
> readers of git only want to know what happened.
> It can be changed on merge to  test: packet: remove unused values
>
>
> On 4 May 2016 at 20:21, Bill Fischofer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Resolve bug https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2220 by removing
>> unused values.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  test/validation/packet/packet.c | 5 ++---
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/test/validation/packet/packet.c
>> b/test/validation/packet/packet.c
>> index 7c9622f..bf8d9f4 100644
>> --- a/test/validation/packet/packet.c
>> +++ b/test/validation/packet/packet.c
>> @@ -1159,7 +1159,7 @@ void packet_test_align(void)
>>                 CU_ASSERT(odp_packet_align(&pkt, 0, pkt_len, 0) < 0);
>>
>>                 offset = seg_len - 5;
>> -               pkt_data = odp_packet_offset(pkt, offset, &seg_len, NULL);
>> +               (void)odp_packet_offset(pkt, offset, &seg_len, NULL);
>>
>>                 /* Realign for addressability */
>>                 CU_ASSERT(odp_packet_align(&pkt, offset,
>> @@ -1167,8 +1167,7 @@ void packet_test_align(void)
>>
>>                 /* Alignment doesn't change packet length or contents */
>>                 CU_ASSERT(odp_packet_len(pkt) == pkt_len);
>> -               aligned_data = odp_packet_offset(pkt, offset,
>> -                                                &aligned_seglen, NULL);
>> +               (void)odp_packet_offset(pkt, offset, &aligned_seglen,
>> NULL);
>>                 _packet_compare_offset(pkt, offset,
>>                                        segmented_test_packet, offset,
>>                                        aligned_seglen);
>> --
>> 2.5.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lng-odp mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mike Holmes
> Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group
> Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs
> "Work should be fun and collaborative, the rest follows"
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to