On 10 May 2016 at 21:31, Nikhil Agarwal <[email protected]> wrote:
> One use case that will benefit from it will be fat ipsec tunnel use case, > where majority of packets coming from one pktio interface belongs to same > sessions. In general, it can be used in case where we are doing batch > processing using burst rx/tx apis(odp_pktio_recv/tx with more than one > packet) and multiple packet needs crypto operations. > > I dont have API changes as of now, but that can be proposed if people > agree. > So is your proposal to add ability to send multiple packets to odp_crypto_operation() API? Maybe you can send an RFC with the changes and we can discuss on the RFC Regards, Bala > > Regards > Nikhil > > On 10 May 2016 at 21:03, Bala Manoharan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Do you have any specific changes or additions to crypto API? or any >> specific use-case which might benefit from the additional API? >> >> Regards, >> Bala >> >> On 10 May 2016 at 20:50, Nikhil Agarwal <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Since we have multi flavor for packet Rx/Tx APIs on queues and >>> scheduler, shall we have have a similar API for crypto operation? It might >>> save significant CPU cycles for implementation having hardware engines. Any >>> thoughts? >>> >>> Regards >>> Nikhil >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lng-odp mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
