Clang build fails due to a missing field in initializer
error. This is a known clang bug
(https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21689). Circumvent
this by using memset() instead.

Signed-off-by: Matias Elo <[email protected]>
---
 platform/linux-generic/pktio/dpdk.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/platform/linux-generic/pktio/dpdk.c 
b/platform/linux-generic/pktio/dpdk.c
index e6af8fb..831dc26 100644
--- a/platform/linux-generic/pktio/dpdk.c
+++ b/platform/linux-generic/pktio/dpdk.c
@@ -177,11 +177,13 @@ static int dpdk_netdev_is_valid(const char *s)
 
 static uint32_t dpdk_vdev_mtu_get(uint8_t port_id)
 {
-       struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info = {0};
+       struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
        struct ifreq ifr;
        int sockfd;
        uint32_t mtu;
 
+       memset(&dev_info, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_dev_info));
+
        rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
        if_indextoname(dev_info.if_index, ifr.ifr_name);
 
@@ -219,11 +221,13 @@ static uint32_t dpdk_mtu_get(pktio_entry_t *pktio_entry)
 
 static int dpdk_vdev_promisc_mode_get(uint8_t port_id)
 {
-       struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info = {0};
+       struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
        struct ifreq ifr;
        int sockfd;
        int mode;
 
+       memset(&dev_info, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_dev_info));
+
        rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
        if_indextoname(dev_info.if_index, ifr.ifr_name);
 
@@ -240,11 +244,13 @@ static int dpdk_vdev_promisc_mode_get(uint8_t port_id)
 
 static int dpdk_vdev_promisc_mode_set(uint8_t port_id, int enable)
 {
-       struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info = {0};
+       struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
        struct ifreq ifr;
        int sockfd;
        int mode;
 
+       memset(&dev_info, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_dev_info));
+
        rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
        if_indextoname(dev_info.if_index, ifr.ifr_name);
 
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to