On 28 June 2016 at 19:26, <[email protected]> wrote: > https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2386 > > Bill Fischofer <[email protected]> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |[email protected] > > --- Comment #1 from Bill Fischofer <[email protected]> --- > How do we get meaningful error logs out of CI? "Build failed" is hardly > sufficient to communicate what problem is being seen. >
Actually that is all you get when you do it manually in this case, but I agree and I think Maxim or Anders has some patches that get the core dump. > > M32_ON_64 hasn't worked for some time due to library dependencies (libpcap, > etc.). Oh, I had not seen the pcap issue, do we have a bug for it ? > I guess one of the larger question is do we need to support this compile > option? ODP compiles 32-bit (GCC and clang) just fine. Maybe not, but I think there is merit, it helps ensure you check 32bit issues even when you build on a 64 bit X86 without the need to cross compile or have a 32bit VM. Lower end SoCs are still in use that use 32bits and this helps us catch issues. > It's not clear who needs > M32_ON_64 since the main reason to run 32-bit ODP is for execution on > actual > 32-bit processors. 64-bit machines should run 6 4-bit ODP apps. > It is just to catch errors when people only test on 64bits, agree no one runs there for real. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > _______________________________________________ > lng-odp mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp > -- Mike Holmes Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs "Work should be fun and collaborative, the rest follows" _______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
