Hi, Bill, Matias For this bug related to the validation scheduler test program, with errors like:
scheduler.c:878 - bctx->sequence == seq I saw a potential problem in the validation scheduler program code itself: After schedule events, it makes copies of these events, which did not retain ordered information attached to the original ones (buffer_header->origin_qe, etc), by enqueue these copies and release those original events the ordered information were lost. I'd like to know what's the defined behavior, for when a thread holds an ordered context, and allocate new events and enqueue them, shall these new allocated events preserve the ordered restriction also? Because if this is the expected behavior, then the event allocation function should be fixed to inheritate ordered information from the ordered context, right? Otherwise we can fix it in the validation scheduler program code. Best Regards, Yi
