OS: openSUSE Leap 42.2 Compiler: gcc-6 Kernel: 4.10.0-rc4-1.g4f824f1-default
Cheers, Marco On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 08:44 -0600, Bill Fischofer wrote: > What environment are you running in (OS, compiler, service levels, etc.)? > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Marco Varlese <marco.varl...@suse.com> > > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > I've pulled latest code from the git repo and got into a compile-time error. > > > > > > > > > > I followed the steps provided in the README file under platform/linux- generic > > > > which are: > > > > ./bootstrap > > > > ./configure > > > > ./make > > > > > > > > Please, see below the output of the compilation. > > > > > > > > CC _fdserver.lo > > > > CC _ishm.lo > > > > CC _ishmphy.lo > > > > CC odp_atomic.lo > > > > CC odp_barrier.lo > > > > CC odp_buffer.lo > > > > CC odp_byteorder.lo > > > > CC odp_classification.lo > > > > CC odp_cpu.lo > > > > CC odp_cpumask.lo > > > > In file included from /usr/include/features.h:365:0, > > > > from /usr/include/sched.h:22, > > > > from odp_cpumask.c:9: > > > > ./include/odp/api/debug.h:42:39: error: negative width in bit-field > > > > '__error_if_negative' > > > > #define ODP_STATIC_ASSERT(cond, msg) _Static_assert(cond, msg) > > > > ^ > > > > odp_cpumask.c:24:1: note: in expansion of macro 'ODP_STATIC_ASSERT' > > > > ODP_STATIC_ASSERT(ODP_CPUMASK_SIZE >= CPU_SETSIZE, > > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > ./include/odp/api/debug.h:42:39: error: negative width in bit-field > > > > '__error_if_negative' > > > > #define ODP_STATIC_ASSERT(cond, msg) _Static_assert(cond, msg) > > > > ^ > > > > odp_cpumask.c:28:1: note: in expansion of macro 'ODP_STATIC_ASSERT' > > > > ODP_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(odp_cpumask_t) >= sizeof(cpu_set_t), > > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Makefile:906: recipe for target 'odp_cpumask.lo' failed > > > > make[1]: *** [odp_cpumask.lo] Error 1 > > > > > > > > I've also tried to pull the MONARCH LTS branch but I get exactly the same > > > > result. > > > > > > > > Any thoughts or help on this would be much appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Marco > > > > > > > > > >
