We need the ring size patch to go in first and then you can review this patch.
Thank you, Honnappa On 11 April 2017 at 02:43, Kevin Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for remind. Awared that if we change it using this way, this patch > should be in the scalable scheduler patch serial based on api-next. > > Kevin > > 2017-04-11 15:37 GMT+08:00 Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) < > [email protected]>: > >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: lng-odp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Kevin >> > Wang >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:38 AM >> > To: [email protected] >> > Cc: Kevin Wang <[email protected]> >> > Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCHv2] validation: scheduler: modify the queue size >> > for atomic queue >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang <[email protected]> >> > --- >> > test/common_plat/validation/api/scheduler/scheduler.c | 2 ++ >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/test/common_plat/validation/api/scheduler/scheduler.c >> > b/test/common_plat/validation/api/scheduler/scheduler.c >> > index 952561c..f46d391 100644 >> > --- a/test/common_plat/validation/api/scheduler/scheduler.c >> > +++ b/test/common_plat/validation/api/scheduler/scheduler.c >> > @@ -1388,6 +1388,7 @@ static int create_queues(void) >> > >> > snprintf(name, sizeof(name), >> > "sched_%d_%d_a", i, j); >> > p.sched.sync = ODP_SCHED_SYNC_ATOMIC; >> > + p.size = BUFS_PER_QUEUE_EXCL; >> >> >> Does this build on top of current master ? Even api-next do not have yet >> the queue size parameter defined. >> >> -Petri >> >> >> > > > -- > Thanks, > Kevin
