> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Brooks [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 7:58 PM > To: Petri Savolainen <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH 4/8] test: validation: add > odp_sys_info_print test > > On 04/21 16:11:30, Petri Savolainen wrote: > > Added validation test for the new system info print call. > > > > Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen <[email protected]> > > --- > > test/common_plat/validation/api/system/system.c | 8 ++++++++ > > test/common_plat/validation/api/system/system.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/test/common_plat/validation/api/system/system.c > b/test/common_plat/validation/api/system/system.c > > index 57ff34eb..5b7ca01a 100644 > > --- a/test/common_plat/validation/api/system/system.c > > +++ b/test/common_plat/validation/api/system/system.c > > @@ -301,6 +301,13 @@ void system_test_odp_cpu_hz_max_id(void) > > } > > } > > > > +void system_test_info_print(void) > > +{ > > + printf("\n\nCalling system info print...\n"); > > + odp_sys_info_print(); > > + printf("...done. "); > > Do these printfs provide useful information?
Those make the validation test output look pretty. Otherwise, output is messed with Test: system_test_info_print ... passed text, since Cunit does not put line feeds in between of those two prints. -Petri
