On 18.05.2017 02:53, Bill Fischofer wrote: > Thanks, but permissions should allow comments if you want feedback.
Permissions updated, thanks for pointing. > Handy summary tables. I assume we'll do the MUSTs. Do we plan to do the > SHOULDs as well? I think, linux-generic should support the following algorihms: Cipher: - AES-CBC (MUST) - AES-CTR (MAY) - 3DES-CBC (MAY) Auth: - HMAC-SHA1 (MUST) - HMAC-SHA256/384/512 (optional) - HMAC-MD5 (unspecified, was MAY) AEAD: - AES-GCM (SHOULD+) I especially do not plan at this point to implement AES-GMAC (it is a nice idea, but standard is really ugly). > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hello, > > For the sake of keeping all data in a single place, I've gather all > crypto-related specs from RFCs in a single document. > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AK74bG9hcJs562FYZ9QIeCVXktdjarQ8eTyrqPm2ttg/edit?usp=sharing > > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AK74bG9hcJs562FYZ9QIeCVXktdjarQ8eTyrqPm2ttg/edit?usp=sharing> > > -- > With best wishes > Dmitry > > -- With best wishes Dmitry
