Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov(lumag) replied on github web page:

line 5
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ env:
         - CONF="--enable-schedule-scalable"
         - CONF="--enable-dpdk-zero-copy"
         - CONF="--disable-static-applications"
+        - CONF="--disable-host-optimization"
+        - CONF="--disable-host-optimization --disable-abi-compat"

Cross-compiling can easily become troublesome, as we also need cross-OpenSSL, 
cross-CUnit, etc.

> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
> As noted, this can be achieved by cross-compiling to an otherwise 
> non-supported architecture.

>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>> What's the use case (other than testing) for this option? @muvarov's 
>> suggestion to cross compile for an otherwise-unsupported ARCH like Xtensa 
>> seems preferable. 

>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>> 2018 for all new copyright dates

>>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>>> @muvarov This is a non-optimized default, so 64 is as good as any. If 
>>>> there is a need to add support for another architecture then it can be 
>>>> added explicitly with the proper sizes and it would no longer fall under 
>>>> the default architecture category.

>>>>> Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov(lumag) wrote:
>>>>> fixed in v2

>>>>>> muvarov wrote
>>>>>> that might be not true. But I also do not see any other way to find 
>>>>>> default size.

>>>>>>> muvarov wrote
>>>>>>> 2018
updated_at 2018-02-13 00:12:50

Reply via email to