Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) replied on github web page:

line 5
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ env:
         - CONF="--enable-schedule-scalable"
         - CONF="--enable-dpdk-zero-copy"
         - CONF="--disable-static-applications"
+        - CONF="--disable-host-optimization"
+        - CONF="--disable-host-optimization --disable-abi-compat"

Ok, I rescind that comment. Please fix the copyright dates and I'm Ok with this.

> Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov(lumag) wrote:
> Cross-compiling can easily become troublesome, as we also need cross-OpenSSL, 
> cross-CUnit, etc.

>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>> As noted, this can be achieved by cross-compiling to an otherwise 
>> non-supported architecture.

>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>> What's the use case (other than testing) for this option? @muvarov's 
>>> suggestion to cross compile for an otherwise-unsupported ARCH like Xtensa 
>>> seems preferable. 

>>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>>> 2018 for all new copyright dates

>>>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>>>> @muvarov This is a non-optimized default, so 64 is as good as any. If 
>>>>> there is a need to add support for another architecture then it can be 
>>>>> added explicitly with the proper sizes and it would no longer fall under 
>>>>> the default architecture category.

>>>>>> Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov(lumag) wrote:
>>>>>> fixed in v2

>>>>>>> muvarov wrote
>>>>>>> that might be not true. But I also do not see any other way to find 
>>>>>>> default size.

>>>>>>>> muvarov wrote
>>>>>>>> 2018
updated_at 2018-02-13 04:23:49

Reply via email to