Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov(lumag) replied on github web page:

line 5
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ env:
         - CONF="--enable-schedule-scalable"
         - CONF="--enable-dpdk-zero-copy"
         - CONF="--disable-static-applications"
+        - CONF="--disable-host-optimization"
+        - CONF="--disable-host-optimization --disable-abi-compat"

@Bill-Fischofer-Linaro fixed now

> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
> Ok, I rescind that comment. Please fix the copyright dates and I'm Ok with 
> this.

>> Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov(lumag) wrote:
>> Cross-compiling can easily become troublesome, as we also need 
>> cross-OpenSSL, cross-CUnit, etc.

>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>> As noted, this can be achieved by cross-compiling to an otherwise 
>>> non-supported architecture.

>>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>>> What's the use case (other than testing) for this option? @muvarov's 
>>>> suggestion to cross compile for an otherwise-unsupported ARCH like Xtensa 
>>>> seems preferable. 

>>>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>>>> 2018 for all new copyright dates

>>>>>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>>>>>> @muvarov This is a non-optimized default, so 64 is as good as any. If 
>>>>>> there is a need to add support for another architecture then it can be 
>>>>>> added explicitly with the proper sizes and it would no longer fall under 
>>>>>> the default architecture category.

>>>>>>> Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov(lumag) wrote:
>>>>>>> fixed in v2

>>>>>>>> muvarov wrote
>>>>>>>> that might be not true. But I also do not see any other way to find 
>>>>>>>> default size.

>>>>>>>>> muvarov wrote
>>>>>>>>> 2018
updated_at 2018-02-14 07:49:53

Reply via email to