Hi Bert,
FYI: regarding the QA form ... in case somebody is in favor of using it
.... I could have someone presenting it in more details. We consider the
QA form a valid tool to communicate errors to the translators and - in
case of time constrains - a good way to prioritize the corrections....
Rafaella
Bert Meersma wrote On 11/10/05 10:46,:
Hi Jigal,
In general it is. Lots of missing icons, incorrect icons, but all in all
a very good start.
Just for a quick laugh... I stumbled upon this babelfish beauty:
"Hoe naar schrijven formules in Math boven twee regels (met handmatig
lijn/regel break):
Maken een lijn/regel einde door met gebruikmaking van de/het "newline"
commando. Everything coming na de regel einde is geplaatst op de
volgende regel."
There are more of those things. I like to call it "Dutlish".
How to divide the work between the volunteers?
Well, that's something we have to take a look at. Because the main TOC of this
version is corrupted. Not all topics are listed. For instance Draw and Writer
are missing. I don't know what happens if we use the tree file that Rafaella
provided us with, it could be that we then have all the topics. If so, than
it's not that complicated to divide the work. I will look into this, this
evening.
Then there's the matter of the QA forms:
I have had an email conversation with Rafaella about this. Outcome is that if the QA forms are too complicated to work with, it's also fine to create issues instead.
I'm in favour of creating issues, but I don't know what you all want, so please let me know.
Regards,
Bert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
